Hardik Pandya Reminded Of “Unique” Comment After ‘Captaincy Blunder’ Cost India 2nd T20I

Team India has been facing severe criticism after the two-wicket defeat against West Indies in the second T20I on Sunday. The most amount of backlash was directed towards skipper Hardik Pandya, who was severely criticised for his poor decision-making. After being restricted to 152/7, the visitors bounced back with the ball as Hardik and spinner Yuzvendra Chahal took three and two wickets respectively. However, it was Nicholas Pooran‘s 67-run knock that guided West Indies to victory in just 18.5 overs.

Despite losing wickets early during the chase, West Indies found their way back after Pooran’s fiery performance. Chahal came as a saviour for India as in the 16th over he scalped two wickets and brought the visitors back into the game. However, Hardik went ahead with Arshdeep Singh and Mukesh Kumar in the last four overs, despite Chahal having one over left. Many fans felt that the move was a ‘blunder’ frome the India captain.

Hardik’s decision of not letting Chahal complete his four-over quota did not go well with the fans as they slammed the all-rounder on Twitter.

The netizens also trolled Hardik for his “It’s ok to be unique” remark, which he gave before the third ODI against West Indies. In Rohit Sharma‘s absence, Hardik led Team India in the second and third ODI and was asked by Samuel Badree what it would mean if he failed to carry forward India’s winning streak against West Indies in the bilateral ODI series. To which he replied, “It’s okay. I like to be unique.”

Apart from the fans, former India batter Abhinav Mukund also blasted the India captain for not letting Chahal bowl his final over and stated that he was “baffled” by Hardik’s decision.

“I can’t get an explanation for it because 10 times out of 10 you would have gone with another over from Chahal and tried to close out the game there, especially with Alzarri Joseph there. I understand the left-hander is still there, but you got Hetmyer out in the previous over, bowling a full one. You have the bigger boundary to deal with,” Mukund said on Jio Cinema.

“I was just a bit baffled by that decision to go back to Arshdeep because he is your strike bowler. If you wanted to bowl him, you could have had him bowl the 19th, left the last over to Mukesh or even brought Arshdeep for the final over, depending on the number of runs,” he added.

Topics mentioned in this article

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.